Nassau Suffolk Limousine Assoc., Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nassau Suffolk Limousine Assoc., Inc. v. City of New York

200 A.D.2d 386, 608 N.Y.S.2d 76

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 386 (Nassau Suffolk Limousine Assoc., Inc. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nassau Suffolk Limousine Assoc., Inc. v. City of New York, 200 A.D.2d 386, 608 N.Y.S.2d 76 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered November 19, 1991, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and granted, in part, defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

It is undisputed that subsequent to the perfection of the appeal, both New York State (L 1992, ch 789, § 3, as amended by L 1992, ch 790) and New York City (35 RCNY ch 6, as amended July 1993 by addition of, inter alia, § 6-50 et seq.) enacted legislation instituting a permit system to regulate the operations of for-hire vehicles which, like those operated by plaintiffs, are based outside of New York City and pick up passengers in the City pursuant to prearrangement. The adoption of this new State and City permit system has rendered moot the issues raised herein, concerning the now superseded City licensing system. Since those issues will not recur, there is no reason for continuing to entertain the appeal (see, 903 Park Ave. Corp. v City Rent Agency, 31 NY2d 330, 333). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Wallach,JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered November 19, 1991, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and granted, in part, defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

It is undisputed that subsequent to the perfection of the appeal, both New York State (L 1992, ch 789, § 3, as amended by L 1992, ch 790) and New York City (35 RCNY ch 6, as amended July 1993 by addition of, inter alia, § 6-50 et seq.) enacted legislation instituting a permit system to regulate the operations of for-hire vehicles which, like those operated by plaintiffs, are based outside of New York City and pick up passengers in the City pursuant to prearrangement. The adoption of this new State and City permit system has rendered moot the issues raised herein, concerning the now superseded City licensing system. Since those issues will not recur, there is no reason for continuing to entertain the appeal (see, 903 Park Ave. Corp. v City Rent Agency, 31 NY2d 330, 333). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Wallach,JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 386, 608 N.Y.S.2d 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassau-suffolk-limousine-assoc-inc-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack