Nassau Sand & Gravel Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co.

S.D. New York

Nassau Sand & Gravel Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co.

52 F.2d 704, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1685

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 52 F.2d 704 (Nassau Sand & Gravel Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nassau Sand & Gravel Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co., 52 F.2d 704, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1685 (S.D.N.Y. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

KNOX, District Judge.

This court has previously found that the injuries sustained by libelant’s boat were due to the fault of Red Star Towing & Transportation Company. While there was some question in the court’s mind as to the extent of the damage attributable to the grounding of the barge, the special,commissioner has reached the conclusion that the broken keel-sons were due to stranding, for which respondent is responsible. I have read the testimony taken before him and shall not disturb his finding. Nor can I, as requested by respondent, hold that libelant’s damages should be confined to the cost of the temporary repairs made to the barge. The appellate court for this circuit has declared, as definitely as language will permit, that the making of temporary repairs, although they may adequately serve the purposes of permanent repairs, does not preclude a libelant from recovering the cost of permanent repairs. See The Elmer A. Keeler (C. C. A.) 194 P. 339, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Downer Corporation (C. C. A.) 11 P.(2d) 466. The other exceptions to the report of the special commissioner, in view of what has been said, are of no consequence, and they will, along with exceptions Nos. 1 and 2, be overruled and the report confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNOX, District Judge.

This court has previously found that the injuries sustained by libelant’s boat were due to the fault of Red Star Towing & Transportation Company. While there was some question in the court’s mind as to the extent of the damage attributable to the grounding of the barge, the special,commissioner has reached the conclusion that the broken keel-sons were due to stranding, for which respondent is responsible. I have read the testimony taken before him and shall not disturb his finding. Nor can I, as requested by respondent, hold that libelant’s damages should be confined to the cost of the temporary repairs made to the barge. The appellate court for this circuit has declared, as definitely as language will permit, that the making of temporary repairs, although they may adequately serve the purposes of permanent repairs, does not preclude a libelant from recovering the cost of permanent repairs. See The Elmer A. Keeler (C. C. A.) 194 P. 339, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Downer Corporation (C. C. A.) 11 P.(2d) 466. The other exceptions to the report of the special commissioner, in view of what has been said, are of no consequence, and they will, along with exceptions Nos. 1 and 2, be overruled and the report confirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.2d 704, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassau-sand-gravel-co-v-red-star-towing-transportation-co-nysd-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack