Nassau Discount Corp. v. Allen

47 Misc. 2d 671, 262 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1637
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 28, 1965·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The resolution of the question whether defendant waived the right to assert any defenses against plaintiff assignee necessarily depends upon whether plaintiff acquired the contract in good faith and for value.

Good faith is a continuing requirement right up to the time the assignee parts with value. In view of the flagrant fraud which has been conceded in the stipulation, on this question there should be a full exploration of plaintiff’s involvement with the assignor’s method of selling in other prior transactions as [672] well as with the instant one. Also the effect of the return of the coupon hook to the assignee involves the resolution of a question of fact on assignee’s good faith which is not covered in the so-called stipulation of facts.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to plaintiff to abide the event.

Concur — Di Gtovanna, Gulotta and Brenner, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nassau Discount Corp. v. Allen, 47 Misc. 2d 671, 262 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

47 Misc. 2d 671 (Nassau Discount Corp. v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. Lopez
89 Misc. 2d 285 (New York County Courts, 1977)
Central Budget Corp. v. Sanchez
53 Misc. 2d 620 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1967)
Cappa v. Steve Aloi-Ford, Inc.
51 Misc. 2d 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)