Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. Gloria B. v. Bertram U.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. Gloria B. v. Bertram U.

206 A.D.2d 431, 616 N.Y.S.2d 190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 431 (Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. Gloria B. v. Bertram U.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. Gloria B. v. Bertram U., 206 A.D.2d 431, 616 N.Y.S.2d 190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Bertram U. appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), entered March 6, 1992, which dismissed his petition to vacate a prior order of filiation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to establish the existence of any newly-discovered evidence (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [2]) or that the respondent had engaged in "fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct” (CPLR 5015 [a] [3]). Accordingly, his application to vacate the prior order of filiation was properly denied. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Bertram U. appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), entered March 6, 1992, which dismissed his petition to vacate a prior order of filiation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to establish the existence of any newly-discovered evidence (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [2]) or that the respondent had engaged in "fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct” (CPLR 5015 [a] [3]). Accordingly, his application to vacate the prior order of filiation was properly denied. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 431, 616 N.Y.S.2d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassau-county-department-of-social-services-ex-rel-gloria-b-v-bertram-u-nyappdiv-1994.