Nassau Bank v. Broadway Bank
54 Barb. 236, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55
Opinion
By the Court,
The plaintiffs were holders for value. It was so found by the referee, and the testimony clearly bears him out in his conclusion. His opinion covers every point raised, and does not require any additional views.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Clerke, Cardozo, and Geo. G. Barnard, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nassau Bank v. Broadway Bank, 54 Barb. 236, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1869).
54 Barb. 236 (Nassau Bank v. Broadway Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd. v. National City Bank
161 A.D. 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Poess v. Twelfth Ward Bank
43 Misc. 45 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Fidelity Trust Co. v. Baker
47 A. 6 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1900)
Freund v. Importers & Traders' National Bank
19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)