Nassar v. Saperstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nassar v. Saperstein

243 A.D.2d 454, 664 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9325

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1997·Published

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered January 4, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) since it failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see, Lauer v Rapp, 190 AD2d 778; Mendoza v Schlossman, 87 AD2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered January 4, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) since it failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see, Lauer v Rapp, 190 AD2d 778; Mendoza v Schlossman, 87 AD2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Nassar v. Saperstein, 243 A.D.2d 454, 664 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

243 A.D.2d 454 (Nassar v. Saperstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related