Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.

193 A.D.2d 1130, 600 N.Y.S.2d 663
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants Richard Gollel and Canandaigua Development Corporation in connection with the purchase of the stock of defendant Canandaigua Development Corporation. Defendants have failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to create a question of fact whether plaintiffs fraudulently induced them to enter into the agreement. Defendants’ conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations of fraud were insufficient to defeat plaintiffs’ motion (Barclays Bank v Sokol, 128 AD2d 492). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp., 193 A.D.2d 1130, 600 N.Y.S.2d 663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 1130 (Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gollel v. Nassar
206 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)