Nass v. Munzing
138 A. 922, 101 N.J. Eq. 798, 16 Stock. 798, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 617
Opinion
The decree appealed from will* be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below bj^ Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Busicirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. ' 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nass v. Munzing, 138 A. 922, 101 N.J. Eq. 798, 16 Stock. 798, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 617 (N.J. 1927).
138 A. 922 (Nass v. Munzing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Hoffman Foundation, C., Corp.
51 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)