Nass v. Munzing

138 A. 922, 101 N.J. Eq. 798, 16 Stock. 798, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 617
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A. 922 (Nass v. Munzing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nass v. Munzing, 138 A. 922, 101 N.J. Eq. 798, 16 Stock. 798, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 617 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will* be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below bj^ Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Busicirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. ' 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. Hoffman Foundation, C., Corp.
51 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A. 922, 101 N.J. Eq. 798, 16 Stock. 798, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nass-v-munzing-nj-1927.