NASR International Trading Co. v. Rahul International Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

NASR International Trading Co. v. Rahul International Inc.

675 So. 2d 704, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6765, 1996 WL 347011

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1996

DocketNo. 95-253

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 704 (NASR International Trading Co. v. Rahul International Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NASR International Trading Co. v. Rahul International Inc., 675 So. 2d 704, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6765, 1996 WL 347011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the points raised on appeal. On the cross-appeal, however, section 68.065(1), Florida Statutes (1991), requires an award of three times the $16,634.60 bad check issued by Nasr International Trading Co., Inc. in addition to, rather than including, the face amount of the check. Krontz v. Feiler, 553 So. 2d 1302 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Hence, the judgment on this basis for Rahul International, Inc., and against Nasr International Trading Co., Inc., shall be increased after remand from $49,-903.80 ($16,634.60 + 2 x $16,634.60) to $66,-538.40 ($16,634.60 + 3 x $16,634.60).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the points raised on appeal. On the cross-appeal, however, section 68.065(1), Florida Statutes (1991), requires an award of three times the $16,634.60 bad check issued by Nasr International Trading Co., Inc. in addition to, rather than including, the face amount of the check. Krontz v. Feiler, 553 So. 2d 1302 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Hence, the judgment on this basis for Rahul International, Inc., and against Nasr International Trading Co., Inc., shall be increased after remand from $49,-903.80 ($16,634.60 + 2 x $16,634.60) to $66,-538.40 ($16,634.60 + 3 x $16,634.60).

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 So. 2d 704, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6765, 1996 WL 347011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasr-international-trading-co-v-rahul-international-inc-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack