Nason v. Thatcher
7 Mass. 398
Opinion
If this society were a party to the suit, its members could not be admitted as witnesses. But as they are mere trustees, and we cannot presume that they will abuse the trust reposed in them by the testator, their interest is too minute to admit of the supposition that it will influence them in their testimony. Let them be sworn.
A verdict being rendered in favor of the sanity of the testator, the decree of the court below was affirmed, and the cause remitted for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nason v. Thatcher, 7 Mass. 398 (Mass. 1811).
7 Mass. 398 (Nason v. Thatcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graphic Packaging Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Russell v. Russell's Exs
8 Del. 103 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1865)
Burdine v. Grand Lodge of Alabama
37 Ala. 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1861)
Campbell v. Tousey
7 Cow. 64 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Fox v. Whitney
16 Mass. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
17 U.S. 250 (Supreme Court, 1819)
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
17 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1819)
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
65 N.H. 473 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1817)
Sears v. Dillingham
12 Mass. 357 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)
Durant v. Starr
11 Mass. 527 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)
Jackson ex dem. Cooder v. Woods
1 Johns. Cas. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1799)
Schenck v. Corshen
1 N.J.L. 219 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1793)