Nasiff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nasiff v. State

43 So. 3d 150, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 2010 WL 3418278

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 1, 2010

DocketNo. 4D08-2999

StatusPublished

This text of 43 So. 3d 150 (Nasiff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nasiff v. State, 43 So. 3d 150, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 2010 WL 3418278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant’s claim; rather, we conclude that appellant’s claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, GERBER, JJ., and KELLEY, GLENN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant’s claim; rather, we conclude that appellant’s claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, GERBER, JJ., and KELLEY, GLENN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 So. 3d 150, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 2010 WL 3418278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasiff-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack