Nasiff v. State
43 So. 3d 150, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 2010 WL 3418278
Opinion
This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant’s claim; rather, we conclude that appellant’s claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nasiff v. State, 43 So. 3d 150, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 2010 WL 3418278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
43 So. 3d 150 (Nasiff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kidd v. State
978 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)