Nashville Lumber Co. v. Corbell

106 S.W. 677, 84 Ark. 596, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 257
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 16, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

This is a motion for an injunction pending appeal. The chancery court refused to enjoin Cor.bell and wife from preventing the lumber company from laying-a tramway across their homestead, on the ground that the conveyance under which the lumber company claimed was void because the wife had not joined therein, and dissolved a temporary injunction which had been granted.

Injunctions and writs of supersedeas are issued by this court to preserve the status quo pending an appeal, where the justice of the case requires it, but not for the purpose of creating a temporary right. This case is the converse of Union Sawmill Co. v. Felsenthal Land & Townsite Company, ante p. 494. For the reasons there given, this application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nashville Lumber Co. v. Corbell, 106 S.W. 677, 84 Ark. 596, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 257 (Ark. 1907).

106 S.W. 677 (Nashville Lumber Co. v. Corbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coking Coal, Inc. v. Arkoma Coal Corp.
641 S.W.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1982)
Ford v. State
209 S.W. 490 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)