Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. Cleghorn & Co.

21 S.E. 227, 94 Ga. 413, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 98
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 19, 1894·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Attachment was sued out in Chattooga county against defendants as non-residents, returnable to Chattooga superior court. Copies of the attachment, together with the affidavit therefor and the bond, were certified as such by the magistrate by whom the attachment was issued, and it was levied by the sheriff of "Whitfield county. At the first term thereafter the defendants moved to dismiss the levy, on the ground that the attachment was void, being returnable to Chattooga superior court, when defendants had no property to attach and none was in fact attached in Chattooga county, nor was there any personal service on either of defendants; and because the attachment should have been made returnable to Whitfield superior court. The motion was overruled, and defendants excepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. Cleghorn & Co., 21 S.E. 227, 94 Ga. 413, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 98 (Ga. 1894).

21 S.E. 227 (Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. Cleghorn & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Robinson
178 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1940
Harmon v. Wiggins
172 S.E. 847 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Carroll & Downs v. Groover
110 S.E. 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn
56 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Woodward Lumber Co. v. Vizard
144 F. 982 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1906)