Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad v. Wade

61 Tenn. 444
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 61 Tenn. 444 (Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad v. Wade, 61 Tenn. 444 (Tenn. 1873).

Opinion

NicholsoN, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Tbe writ in this case was issued and served on the defendants by a wrong name. Before filing declaration plaintiff obtained leave to amend the writ by inserting tbe true name. Declaration" was then filed and defendant put in tbe plea of not guilty. Two terms afterwards defendant obtained leave to file a plea in abatement; but, on motion of tbe plaintiff, •at tbe same time, tbe Court struck out tbe plea, and tbe cause was tried on tbe plea in bar.

[445]*445There was no ground for a plea in abatement for misnomer, after the amendment was made, and especially after plea in bar and two terms after the amendment and filing of the' declaration. Heisk. Dig., 6-7.

The Court erred in allowing the plea in abatement to be filed, but corrected the error by striking out the plea and trying the cause on the plea in bar.

This being the only error assigned and relied on, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Tenn. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nashville-chattanooga-railroad-v-wade-tenn-1873.