Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Nashelman v. Grand Lodge Progressive Order of West

Nashelman v. Grand Lodge Progressive Order of West

209 Ill. App. 636
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 12, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,188
StatusPublished

This text of 209 Ill. App. 636 (Nashelman v. Grand Lodge Progressive Order of West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nashelman v. Grand Lodge Progressive Order of West, 209 Ill. App. 636 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Tbial, § 45*—when remarks of court prejudicial. In an action to recover under an accident policy, remarks of the court in ruling upon the testimony held prejudicial to defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nashelman-v-grand-lodge-progressive-order-of-west-illappct-1918.