Nash v. Yablon-Nash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nash v. Yablon-Nash

262 A.D.2d 377, 691 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 377 (Nash v. Yablon-Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. Yablon-Nash, 262 A.D.2d 377, 691 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which [378]*378the parties were divorced by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaFauci, J.), entered March 20, 1996, the plaintiff former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court (Golar, J.), entered February 5, 1998, as, after a hearing, denied his application to vacate his maintenance obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, where the plaintiff former husband has continuously and wantonly flouted his legal obligations to his former wife and family, the Supreme Court properly denied his application. Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which [378]*378the parties were divorced by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaFauci, J.), entered March 20, 1996, the plaintiff former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court (Golar, J.), entered February 5, 1998, as, after a hearing, denied his application to vacate his maintenance obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, where the plaintiff former husband has continuously and wantonly flouted his legal obligations to his former wife and family, the Supreme Court properly denied his application. Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 377, 691 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-yablon-nash-nyappdiv-1999.