Nash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nash v. State

532 S.W.3d 203

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 22, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104604

StatusPublished

This text of 532 S.W.3d 203 (Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. State, 532 S.W.3d 203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Nash appeals the judgment of the motion court dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motions to file “exhibits” out of time, taken with this ease, are denied. The findings of the motion court were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Nash appeals the judgment of the motion court dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motions to file “exhibits” out of time, taken with this ease, are denied. The findings of the motion court were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 S.W.3d 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-state-moctapp-2017.