Nash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nash v. State

532 S.W.3d 203

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2017·No. No. ED 104604·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Nash appeals the judgment of the motion court dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motions to file “exhibits” out of time, taken with this ease, are denied. The findings of the motion court were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Nash appeals the judgment of the motion court dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motions to file “exhibits” out of time, taken with this ease, are denied. The findings of the motion court were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Nash v. State, 532 S.W.3d 203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

532 S.W.3d 203 (Nash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.