Nash v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nash v. State

24 S.E.2d 325, 68 Ga. App. 834, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 373

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 12, 1943·No. 30019.·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The bill of exceptions assigns error on the overruling of the motion for new trial on the general grounds only, after verdict of guilty of assault with intent to rape. It would be of no benefit to set forth the evidence. It sustained the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The bill of exceptions assigns error on the overruling of the motion for new trial on the general grounds only, after verdict of guilty of assault with intent to rape. It would be of no benefit to set forth the evidence. It sustained the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Nash v. State, 24 S.E.2d 325, 68 Ga. App. 834, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 373 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

24 S.E.2d 325 (Nash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.