Nash v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nash v. State

94 S.E. 60, 21 Ga. App. 76, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 428

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 30, 1917

Docket9050

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 60 (Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. State, 94 S.E. 60, 21 Ga. App. 76, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the court, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury, to adjudge the defendant guilty. Miller v. State, 9 Ga. App. 827 (72 S. E. 279).

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, notwithstanding the judgment overruling the motion was rendered, as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, “on Friday the thirteenth.”

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI