Nash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nash v. State

363 So. 2d 147

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 19, 1978

DocketNo. 77-2116

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 147 (Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. State, 363 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court, in a criminal prosecution, excluded a prospective defense witness for violation of the rule of sequestration¹ without complying with the procedures and principles laid down by the Supreme Court of Florida in Dumas v. State, 350 So.2d 464 (Fla.1977).²

Therefore, the conviction must be reversed, with directions to grant the appellant a new trial.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court, in a criminal prosecution, excluded a prospective defense witness for violation of the rule of sequestration¹ without complying with the procedures and principles laid down by the Supreme Court of Florida in Dumas v. State, 350 So.2d 464 (Fla.1977).²

Therefore, the conviction must be reversed, with directions to grant the appellant a new trial.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 So. 2d 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack