Nash v. State
173 So. 269, 27 Ala. App. 392, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
This text of 173 So. 269 (Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nash v. State, 173 So. 269, 27 Ala. App. 392, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the convictions, and for that reason the general charge as requested by the defendant was properly refused and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
The record is in all things regular and without error.
•The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 So. 269, 27 Ala. App. 392, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-state-alactapp-1937.