Nash v. State

173 So. 269, 27 Ala. App. 392, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1937·No. 8 Div. 432.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the convictions, and for that reason the general charge as requested by the defendant was properly refused and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

The record is in all things regular and without error.

•The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash v. State, 173 So. 269, 27 Ala. App. 392, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

173 So. 269 (Nash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.