Nash v. Savannah Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nash v. Savannah Electric Co.

91 S.E. 240, 19 Ga. App. 175, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 48

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 23, 1917·No. 7539·Published

Opinion

Broyles, ,P. J.

Under the particular facts of the case, the petition, construed (as it must be) most strongly against the plaintiff, did not set forth a cause of action, and the court committed no error in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff,

cited: Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. McAllister, 126 Ga. 448; Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. Norris, 135 Ga. 838, 843; Macon Ry. Co. v. Vining, 120 Ga. 511; G., C. & N. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 120 Ga. 381; Atlanta Terminal Co. v. Johnson, 15 Ga. App. 22; A. & B. Railroad Co. v. Douglas, 119 Ga. 658; Dorsey v. Central Ry. Co., 113 Ga. 565; King v. S. A. L. Ry., 1 Ga. App. 88; Ellison v. Ga. R. Co., 87 Ga. 692 (8); Central R. Co. v. Thompson, 76 Ga. 770; Wilkes v. W. & A. R. Co., 109 Ga. 794; Central R. Co. v. Gleason, 72 Ga. 742; Central R. Co. v. Perry, 58 Ga. 461 (3).

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant, cited and distinguished cases cited above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, ,P. J.

Under the particular facts of the case, the petition, construed (as it must be) most strongly against the plaintiff, did not set forth a cause of action, and the court committed no error in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff,

cited: Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. McAllister, 126 Ga. 448; Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. Norris, 135 Ga. 838, 843; Macon Ry. Co. v. Vining, 120 Ga. 511; G., C. & N. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 120 Ga. 381; Atlanta Terminal Co. v. Johnson, 15 Ga. App. 22; A. & B. Railroad Co. v. Douglas, 119 Ga. 658; Dorsey v. Central Ry. Co., 113 Ga. 565; King v. S. A. L. Ry., 1 Ga. App. 88; Ellison v. Ga. R. Co., 87 Ga. 692 (8); Central R. Co. v. Thompson, 76 Ga. 770; Wilkes v. W. & A. R. Co., 109 Ga. 794; Central R. Co. v. Gleason, 72 Ga. 742; Central R. Co. v. Perry, 58 Ga. 461 (3).

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant, cited and distinguished cases cited above.

Nash v. Savannah Electric Co., 91 S.E. 240, 19 Ga. App. 175, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 48 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

91 S.E. 240 (Nash v. Savannah Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related