Nash v. Rattray
This text of 112 So. 835 (Nash v. Rattray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for money had and received. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
The assignments of error relate only to the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion to suppress the depositions of certain witnesses for the plaintiff, in giving the affirmative charge for the plaintiff, and refusing a like charge requested by defendant. These assignments of error present questions which are here reviewable only by bill of exceptions. Mauney v. Elec., etc., Co., 210 Ala. 554, 98 So. 874; Sov. Camp, W. O. W., v. Ward, 201 Ala. 446, 78 So. 824; Wood v. McClure, 209 Ala. 523, 96 So. 577; Garner v. Thach, 208 Ala. 11, 93 So. 416; Allen v. Mendelsohn & Son, 207 Ala. 527, 93 So. 416, 31 A. L. R. 1063. There is no bill of exceptions.
There are no assignments of error based upon the record proper. It results, therefore, that the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 835, 216 Ala. 168, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-rattray-ala-1927.