Nash v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nash v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

85 A.D.3d 414, 923 N.Y.S.2d 840

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 85 A.D.3d 414 (Nash v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, 85 A.D.3d 414, 923 N.Y.S.2d 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 15, 2010, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding postjudgment interest at the fixed rate of nine percent per annum, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7106 (L 1950, ch 301, § 6) states that both New York and New Jersey consent to liability on the part of defendant Port Authority for tortious acts “to the same extent as though it were a private corporation.” By its plain meaning, the statutory language indicates that the Port Authority should be treated as if it were a private corporation, which requires that a fixed interest rate of nine percent, as applies to private corporations pursuant to CPLR 5004, is applicable. Given the express language of section 7106, we reject the Port Authority’s claims that it is entitled as a “public corporation” to the specialized interest rate provisions of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 2501 (L 1939, ch 585, as amended by L 1982, ch 681, § 4).

We have' considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 15, 2010, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding postjudgment interest at the fixed rate of nine percent per annum, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7106 (L 1950, ch 301, § 6) states that both New York and New Jersey consent to liability on the part of defendant Port Authority for tortious acts “to the same extent as though it were a private corporation.” By its plain meaning, the statutory language indicates that the Port Authority should be treated as if it were a private corporation, which requires that a fixed interest rate of nine percent, as applies to private corporations pursuant to CPLR 5004, is applicable. Given the express language of section 7106, we reject the Port Authority’s claims that it is entitled as a “public corporation” to the specialized interest rate provisions of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 2501 (L 1939, ch 585, as amended by L 1982, ch 681, § 4).

We have' considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.3d 414, 923 N.Y.S.2d 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-port-authority-of-new-york-new-jersey-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack