Nash v. Partners
This text of 269 A.D.2d 228 (Nash v. Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered December 3, 1998, which, in an action to recover monies allegedly withheld in contravention of a partnership agreement, denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment on their fifth, sixth and eighth defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court correctly held that ambiguities in the subject partnership agreement and its amendment rendered its interpretation as a matter of law impracticable at this juncture in the litigation (cf., Payne v Palisades Interstate Park Commn., 226 AD2d 902, lv denied 88 NY2d 810), and that questions of fact precluded resolution of the agreement’s ambiguities on the basis of extrinsic evidence. We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 228, 702 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-partners-nyappdiv-2000.