Nash v. McIntosh

492 S.E.2d 75, 328 S.C. 76, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 10, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a petition with this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk of the circuit court to [77] accept a document for filing. This document, which was issued by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, allows a “judgment” issued by “Our One Supreme Court, Common Law Venue, Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction” in Franklin, North Carolina, to be filed as a foreign judgment in the District of Columbia, and indicates that the judgment of “Our One Supreme Court” is entitled to the same force and effect as a judgment issued in the District of Columbia. Petitioner argues that this State must accept this document for filing under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. U.S. CONST, art. IV, § 1.

On October 6, 1997, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued an order vacating the filing of the judgment of “Our One Supreme Court” nunc pro tunc to the date of its filing with that court. The Superior Court found that the judgment of “Our One Supreme Court” is not entitled to full faith and credit under either the Constitution of the United States or the law of the District of Columbia.1 This renders petitioner’s request for a writ of mandamus moot and the petition is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/a/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

/a/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/a/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash v. McIntosh, 492 S.E.2d 75, 328 S.C. 76, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 188 (S.C. 1997).

492 S.E.2d 75 (Nash v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Audio Investments v. Robertson
203 F. Supp. 2d 555 (D. South Carolina, 2002)