Nash v. Lerner
724 A.2d 798, 157 N.J. 535, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 81
Opinions
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).
Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nash v. Lerner, 724 A.2d 798, 157 N.J. 535, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 81 (N.J. 1999).
724 A.2d 798 (Nash v. Lerner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WENDY CHERRY-HERNANDEZ VS. JOAO C. RIBEIRO (L-4646-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
23 A.3d 912 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)