Nash v. Cowart

133 S.E. 263, 162 Ga. 236, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1926·No. No. 5146·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

The allegations of the petition were insufficient to authorize the intervention of a court of equity. Civil Code (1910), § 4596; see Spooner v. Bank of Donalsonville, 159 Ga. 295 (125 S. E. 456), as to statement of the general rule. The judge did not err in refusing a temporary injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All Hie Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash v. Cowart, 133 S.E. 263, 162 Ga. 236, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 149 (Ga. 1926).

133 S.E. 263 (Nash v. Cowart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spooner v. Bank of Donalsonville
125 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)