Nash-Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner

42 F.2d 192, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11086, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4250, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9407, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 9, 1930·No. No. 251·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction for the reasons given in Massachusetts Eire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 42 F.(2d) 189, handed down herewith. The facts are the same, except that the petitioner is a Delaware corporation, which filed its return in California. The ease is a more striking illustration of the possible consequences. We should have to find very solid reasons for supposing that Congress intended to impose upon us at the will of the parties a controversy which for obvious reasons properly belongs either in the Ninth circuit, or in the District of Columbia. We may repeat here as well, however, that in fact the petitioner has suffered nothing from dismissal.

Petition dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash-Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner, 42 F.2d 192, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11086, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4250, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9407, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11 (2d Cir. 1930).

42 F.2d 192 (Nash-Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nash-Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner
44 F.2d 376 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)