Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH
This text of 2008 DNH 024 (Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH 06-CV-400-SM 01/30/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Naser Jewelers, Inc., Plaintiff
v. Civil No. 06-CV-400-SM Opinion No. 2008 DNH 024 City of Concord. N H . Defendant
O R D E R
This court earlier denied plaintiff's motion for preliminary
injunctive relief because it concluded that the City's regulation
banning all electronic signs (also known as "Electronic Messaging
Centers" or "EMCs") was content-neutral and narrowly tailored to
serve significant governmental interests — aesthetics and traffic
safety — and allowed for reasonable alternative channels of
communication. See, e.g.. Gun Owners' Action League. Inc. v.
Swift. 284 F .3d 198, 212 (1st Cir. 2002).
Plaintiff appealed that denial of preliminary relief, and,
on January 18, 2008, the court of appeals affirmed, holding that:
Concord's prohibition of EMCs is a constitutionally permissible content-neutral regulation. Since [Naser Jewelers, Inc.] has no probability of success on the merits of its claim, we need not address the other factors in the preliminary injunction determination. Naser Jewelers, Inc. v. City of Concord, New Hampshire, No. 07-
2098, slip op. at 19, (1st Cir. January 19, 2008) .
The City moves for summary judgment on a number of grounds,
but one will suffice. Because, as a matter of law, the City's
regulation of electronic signs is content-neutral and narrowly
tailored to serve significant governmental interests, and allows
for reasonable alternative channels of communication, plaintiff
cannot prevail on its claim. There are no disputes as to
material facts. Accordingly, the City's motion is granted.
Conclusion
Defendant's motion for summary judgment (document no. 34) is
hereby granted. The clerk shall close this case.
SO ORDERED.
S/ceven J / M c Auliffe ’ C hief Judge
January 30, 2008
cc: Douglas M. Bragg, Esq. John F. Winston, Esq. Stephen H. Roberts, Esq. Charles P. Bauer, Esq. John T. Alexander, Esq. Lisa Lee, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 DNH 024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naser-jewelers-v-concord-nh-nhd-2008.