Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH

2008 DNH 024
CourtDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 30, 2008
Docket06-CV-400-SM
StatusPublished

This text of 2008 DNH 024 (Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH, 2008 DNH 024 (D.N.H. 2008).

Opinion

Naser Jewelers v. Concord, NH 06-CV-400-SM 01/30/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Naser Jewelers, Inc., Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 06-CV-400-SM Opinion No. 2008 DNH 024 City of Concord. N H . Defendant

O R D E R

This court earlier denied plaintiff's motion for preliminary

injunctive relief because it concluded that the City's regulation

banning all electronic signs (also known as "Electronic Messaging

Centers" or "EMCs") was content-neutral and narrowly tailored to

serve significant governmental interests — aesthetics and traffic

safety — and allowed for reasonable alternative channels of

communication. See, e.g.. Gun Owners' Action League. Inc. v.

Swift. 284 F .3d 198, 212 (1st Cir. 2002).

Plaintiff appealed that denial of preliminary relief, and,

on January 18, 2008, the court of appeals affirmed, holding that:

Concord's prohibition of EMCs is a constitutionally permissible content-neutral regulation. Since [Naser Jewelers, Inc.] has no probability of success on the merits of its claim, we need not address the other factors in the preliminary injunction determination. Naser Jewelers, Inc. v. City of Concord, New Hampshire, No. 07-

2098, slip op. at 19, (1st Cir. January 19, 2008) .

The City moves for summary judgment on a number of grounds,

but one will suffice. Because, as a matter of law, the City's

regulation of electronic signs is content-neutral and narrowly

tailored to serve significant governmental interests, and allows

for reasonable alternative channels of communication, plaintiff

cannot prevail on its claim. There are no disputes as to

material facts. Accordingly, the City's motion is granted.

Conclusion

Defendant's motion for summary judgment (document no. 34) is

hereby granted. The clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED.

S/ceven J / M c Auliffe ’ C hief Judge

January 30, 2008

cc: Douglas M. Bragg, Esq. John F. Winston, Esq. Stephen H. Roberts, Esq. Charles P. Bauer, Esq. John T. Alexander, Esq. Lisa Lee, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 DNH 024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naser-jewelers-v-concord-nh-nhd-2008.