Naseman v. Raven

914 N.W.2d 370
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 20, 2018·No. SC: 157354; COA: 339480·Published

Opinion

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions of plaintiff-appellant to appoint counsel to assist him in the proceedings before this Court and to strike the answer filed by defendant-appellee are DENIED. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 10, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naseman v. Raven, 914 N.W.2d 370 (Mich. 2018).

914 N.W.2d 370 (Naseman v. Raven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.