Nascimiento v. Martin C. Boire, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nascimiento v. Martin C. Boire, P.A.

149 So. 3d 690, 2014 WL 541161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2043

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-1641

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 690 (Nascimiento v. Martin C. Boire, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nascimiento v. Martin C. Boire, P.A., 149 So. 3d 690, 2014 WL 541161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2043 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2018) (“For the convenience of the parties or witnesses or in the interest of justice, any court of record may transfer any civil action to any other court of record in which it might have been brought.”); see also Siegel v. Siegel, 575 So.2d 1267, 1272 (Fla.1991) (quoting Bedingfield v. Bedingfield, 417 So.2d 1047, 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)) (“In general, where courts within one sovereignty have concurrent jurisdiction, the court which first exercises its jurisdiction acquires exclusive jurisdiction to proceed with that case. This is called the ‘principle of priority.’ ”); Hirsch v. DiGaetano, 732 So.2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“The principle of priority rests not only upon comity between courts of concurrent jurisdiction, but also acts to prevent unnecessary litigation and a multiplicity of suits.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2018) (“For the convenience of the parties or witnesses or in the interest of justice, any court of record may transfer any civil action to any other court of record in which it might have been brought.”); see also Siegel v. Siegel, 575 So.2d 1267, 1272 (Fla.1991) (quoting Bedingfield v. Bedingfield, 417 So.2d 1047, 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)) (“In general, where courts within one sovereignty have concurrent jurisdiction, the court which first exercises its jurisdiction acquires exclusive jurisdiction to proceed with that case. This is called the ‘principle of priority.’ ”); Hirsch v. DiGaetano, 732 So.2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“The principle of priority rests not only upon comity between courts of concurrent jurisdiction, but also acts to prevent unnecessary litigation and a multiplicity of suits.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 3d 690, 2014 WL 541161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nascimiento-v-martin-c-boire-pa-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack