Nascimento v. Dummer
This text of 18 F. App'x 672 (Nascimento v. Dummer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joseph F. Nascimento and his minor daughter Kendall E. Nascimento appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), of their civil rights action seeking reversal of a Montana state court decision regarding the custody of Kendall Nascimento. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal and affirm. See H.C. v. Koppel, 203 F.3d 610, 613 (9th Cir.2000) (holding [673]*673that federal district courts should abstain from interfering with pending state court proceedings); see also Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 291 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review a final state court decision in a particular case).
We deny all pending motions,
AFFIRMED,
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. App'x 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nascimento-v-dummer-ca9-2001.