Nasby v. Garrett

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 eK OK 6 || BRENDAN NASBY, Case No. 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC 7 Petitioner, v. ORDER

9 E.K. MCDANIEL, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed first 13 || Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 215) is GRANTED. 14 On April 8, 2021, the Court appointed counsel for petitioner (ECF No. 211) after granting 15 || motions to withdraw as counsel (ECF Nos. 208, 209). The Court further ordered the stay and 16 || administrative closure to remain in place for 90 days to allow new counsel time to review the 17 || extensive prior proceedings and claims herein as well as to confer with petitioner. Petitioner 18 || requests a 46-day extension of the stay and administrative closure. The stay and administrative 19 || closure is extended until August 23, 2021. By granting any extension herein, the Court makes no 20 || implied finding or representation as to the timeliness of any claim asserted or to be asserted herein. 21 || See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 22 DATED this 26" day of July 2021. 23 -

24 L Y R. HICK 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28