Narvaez v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Narvaez v. United States

210 F. App'x 339

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2006·No. No. 06-7516·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Luis M. Narvaez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Narvaez v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00469, 2006 WL 2345811 (WD.Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Luis M. Narvaez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Narvaez v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00469, 2006 WL 2345811 (WD.Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Narvaez v. United States, 210 F. App'x 339 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

210 F. App'x 339 (Narvaez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related