Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Narvaez v. Pestana

Narvaez v. Pestana

780 So. 2d 267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120, 2001 WL 194929
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-2776
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 780 So. 2d 267 (Narvaez v. Pestana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Narvaez v. Pestana, 780 So. 2d 267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120, 2001 WL 194929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. By itself, a landlord’s right to enter the premises and make repairs under a lease does not constitute control of the premises só as to impose on the landlord a duty to protect a tenant’s patrons from the criminal or even negligent acts of third parties on the premises. An owner is not responsible for injuries to persons caused solely by the lessee’s operations and activities. Cf. Craig v. Gate Maritime Properties, Inc., 631 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

We find no error in the points raised on appeal.

WARNER, C.J., FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KEITH R.E. JOHNSON AND KREJ LEASING, INC. v. AKEEFE GARRETT
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Morris
944 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 So. 2d 267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120, 2001 WL 194929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narvaez-v-pestana-fladistctapp-2001.