Narvaez v. Pestana
780 So. 2d 267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120, 2001 WL 194929
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 4D00-2776·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. By itself, a landlord’s right to enter the premises and make repairs under a lease does not constitute control of the premises só as to impose on the landlord a duty to protect a tenant’s patrons from the criminal or even negligent acts of third parties on the premises. An owner is not responsible for injuries to persons caused solely by the lessee’s operations and activities. Cf. Craig v. Gate Maritime Properties, Inc., 631 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
We find no error in the points raised on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Narvaez v. Pestana, 780 So. 2d 267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120, 2001 WL 194929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
780 So. 2d 267 (Narvaez v. Pestana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
KEITH R.E. JOHNSON AND KREJ LEASING, INC. v. AKEEFE GARRETT
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Morris
944 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)