Narus v. Koproski, No. Cv89 02 95 54s (Oct. 19, 1990)
This text of 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2753 (Narus v. Koproski, No. Cv89 02 95 54s (Oct. 19, 1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The problem concerns the proceeds of the sale of a house formerly owned by Martha Parker, of whom the plaintiff had been appointed conservator of her estate by the Probate Court for Shelton. The money was deposited in a checking account in the Great Country Bank in Ansonia. The account was in the names of Mrs. Parker and the defendant jointly. The defendant had been paying bills from this account for Mrs. Parker who had been living in the Wicke Health Center in Shelton from January 1987 on. In 1987 and 1988 five withdrawals were made from the account in the form of four cashier's checks with the defendant as payee and one for a money order for cash which the defendant endorsed. These five withdrawals totalled $24,600.
Although the plaintiff has tried to find out what the defendant did with this money, the defendant has refused to tell him and this action then was begun.
This is the classic case for an accounting. See McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.,
The defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.
The matter will be assigned for further proceedings at the attorney's convenience.
THOMAS J. O'SULLIVAN, TRIAL REFEREE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 2753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narus-v-koproski-no-cv89-02-95-54s-oct-19-1990-connsuperct-1990.