Narson v. Rodell

774 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14604, 2000 WL 1671461
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rutshaw v. Arakas, 549 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N. A., 512 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Narson v. Rodell, 774 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14604, 2000 WL 1671461 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 742 (Narson v. Rodell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Chaple
774 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)