Narson v. Rodell

774 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14604, 2000 WL 1671461
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-2698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 774 So. 2d 742 (Narson v. Rodell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Narson v. Rodell, 774 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14604, 2000 WL 1671461 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rutshaw v. Arakas, 549 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N. A., 512 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Chaple
774 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
774 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14604, 2000 WL 1671461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narson-v-rodell-fladistctapp-2000.