Narrows Corp. v. Boca Ciega Sanitary District

230 So. 2d 49, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1970
DocketNo. 69-265
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 230 So. 2d 49 (Narrows Corp. v. Boca Ciega Sanitary District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Narrows Corp. v. Boca Ciega Sanitary District, 230 So. 2d 49, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

LILES, Judge.

Appellants sought to contest the validity of a Special Assessment levied against their property in a sewer improvement district. Before the contest came on for final hearing appellants lost their property through a foreclosure proceeding. Ap-pellee then filed a motion to dismiss because of the transfer of title, claiming that since appellants had lost title to their property they were not the real party in interest.

The trial judge granted the motion to dismiss and we are called upon to construe Rule 1.260(c), RCP, 30 F.S.A., which reads as follows:

“(c) Transfer of Interest. In case of any transfer of interest, the action may be continued by or against the original party, unless the court upon motion directs the person to whom the interest is transferred to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party. * * * »

The real party in interest, who purchased the property after foreclosure, filed a motion for substitution of parties; however, the court granted the motion to dismiss while the motion for substitution was still pending. That is of no importance in this particular matter because the above mentioned rule shows that it is not necessary that such motion be filed since “the action may be continued by or against the original party.”

For the reason that the action contesting the Special Assessment could be continued by the original party, it appears that the trial judge was in error in dismissing the complaint; and we reverse and remand for action consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. Gonzalez
901 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Collier v. Canal Insurance Co.
511 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 So. 2d 49, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narrows-corp-v-boca-ciega-sanitary-district-fladistctapp-1970.