Narez v. Incarnate Word Hospital

Missouri Court of Appeals

Narez v. Incarnate Word Hospital

861 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. No. 63607·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mary A. Narez, appeals from a determination of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mary A. Narez, appeals from a determination of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Narez v. Incarnate Word Hospital, 861 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 202 (Narez v. Incarnate Word Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.