Home/New York Court of Appeals/Nares v. M & W Waterproofing

Nares v. M & W Waterproofing

818 N.E.2d 660, 3 N.Y.3d 698, 785 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2312
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 21, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 818 N.E.2d 660 (Nares v. M & W Waterproofing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nares v. M & W Waterproofing, 818 N.E.2d 660, 3 N.Y.3d 698, 785 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2312 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

Motion by NTJ Associates for leave to appeal from the March 9, 2004 Appellate Division order dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, *699 90 NY2d 777, 780-781 [1997]). Motion by M & W Waterproofing for leave to appeal from the April 8, 2004 amended judgment of Supreme Court dismissed as untimely (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 781 [1997]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
818 N.E.2d 660, 3 N.Y.3d 698, 785 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nares-v-m-w-waterproofing-ny-2004.