Narenkivicius v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Narenkivicius v. New York State Liquor Authority

29 A.D.2d 654, 286 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 654 (Narenkivicius v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Narenkivicius v. New York State Liquor Authority, 29 A.D.2d 654, 286 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 7,1967, which inter alla annulled the appellant Authority’s redetermination approving the application of appellants Wallace and Volk for a package liquor store license, reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, payable jointly to the appellants who filed separate briefs; proceeding dismissed on the merits; and redetermination of the Authority confirmed. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. In our opinion, the record before the Authority shows a rational basis for its conclusion that public convenience and advantage will be served by approval of the application (Matter of Nevis v. State Liq. Auth., 17 N Y 2d 828; Matter of Hub Wine & Liq. Co. v. State Liq. Auth., 16 N Y 2d 112, [655]*655117; Matter of Abarno’s Wines & Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 28 A D 2d 822). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 7,1967, which inter alla annulled the appellant Authority’s redetermination approving the application of appellants Wallace and Volk for a package liquor store license, reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, payable jointly to the appellants who filed separate briefs; proceeding dismissed on the merits; and redetermination of the Authority confirmed. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. In our opinion, the record before the Authority shows a rational basis for its conclusion that public convenience and advantage will be served by approval of the application (Matter of Nevis v. State Liq. Auth., 17 N Y 2d 828; Matter of Hub Wine & Liq. Co. v. State Liq. Auth., 16 N Y 2d 112, [655]*655117; Matter of Abarno’s Wines & Liqs. v. State Liq. Auth., 28 A D 2d 822). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 654, 286 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narenkivicius-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1968.