Naren Chaganti v. CIR

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 2018
Docket17-3804
StatusUnpublished

This text of Naren Chaganti v. CIR (Naren Chaganti v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naren Chaganti v. CIR, (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-3804 ___________________________

Naren Chaganti

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________

Appeal from The United States Tax Court

____________

Submitted: October 29, 2018 Filed: December 14, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Naren Chaganti appeals from a tax court decision upholding the Commissioner’s determination finding him liable for income tax deficiencies and penalties related to his 2006 and 2007 taxes.

Following a careful review, see DKD Enter.v. C.I.R., 685 F.3d 730, 734 (8th Cir. 2012) (tax court’s legal conclusions are reviewed de novo and its factual findings for clear error; unless claimed deductions come clearly within scope of statute, they are not to be allowed); see also Parrish v. C.I.R., 168 F.3d 1098, 1102 (8th Cir. 1999) (tax court’s finding that taxpayer is liable for accuracy-related penalties under 26 U.S.C. § 6662 is reviewed for clear error). Although we do not affirm the tax court’s conclusion that the mere fact that petitioner was ordered to pay opposing counsel attorney’s fees under [28 U.S.C.] § 1927, demonstrates that those amounts were not ordinary and necessary to the practice of law, for reasons explained by the tax court we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination of income tax deficiencies and penalties was correct. Critically, the district judge’s sanctions order details the facts in this case which show that the payments are not deductible under the Internal Revenue Code §§ 162(f) and 165(a). See Katoch v. Mediq/PRN Life Support Services, Inc., 2007 WL 2434052 at *6-10 (E.D. Mo. 2007), aff’d, 330 Fed.Appx. 626 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

David D. Parrish v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
168 F.3d 1098 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
DKD Enterprises v. Commissioner of IRS
685 F.3d 730 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Katoch v. Mediq/PRN Life Support Services, Inc.
330 F. App'x 626 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Naren Chaganti v. CIR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naren-chaganti-v-cir-ca8-2018.