Nardone v. Coyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nardone v. Coyne

23 A.D.2d 820, 258 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4476

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1965·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified to increase allowance for fees to the -amount of $7,500 for services, plus such actual disbursements as the appellant Averbach can establish as necessary, and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants. Memorandum: The amount awarded by the Trial Judge was inadequate to fairly compensate the attorney for the complainant for his services. In addition, he should be allowed necessary disbursements. (Appeal by petitioner and attorney from part of order of Onondaga Family Court which orders respondent to pay $4,000 counsel fees, on ground of inadequacy.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified to increase allowance for fees to the -amount of $7,500 for services, plus such actual disbursements as the appellant Averbach can establish as necessary, and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants. Memorandum: The amount awarded by the Trial Judge was inadequate to fairly compensate the attorney for the complainant for his services. In addition, he should be allowed necessary disbursements. (Appeal by petitioner and attorney from part of order of Onondaga Family Court which orders respondent to pay $4,000 counsel fees, on ground of inadequacy.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.

Nardone v. Coyne, 23 A.D.2d 820, 258 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

23 A.D.2d 820 (Nardone v. Coyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related