Nardino Colotti v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 30, 2021·No. 1:11-cv-01402·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALEX RUDAJ, NIKOLA DEDAJ, NARDINO COLOTTI, PRENKA IVEZAJ, and ANGELO DIPIETRO, Petitioners, 04cr1110 (DLC) llev1782 (DLC) -against- 11lev1510 (DLC) llev1l402 (DLC) licv1556 (DLC) 20cv4889 (DLC) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the

reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 29, 2021, The October 19, 2021 petition for § 2255 relief is denied. But since the issues raised by Petitioners are those “that reasonable jurists could debate,” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), a certificate of appealability is granted; accordingly, this case is closed. DATED: New York, New York March 30, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Cowy BY: Dew) } Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nardino Colotti v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Nardino Colotti v. United States (Nardino Colotti v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)