Narcomey v. Hull

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Narcomey v. Hull

1931 OK 194, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 873

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 28, 1931

Docket19934

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK 194 (Narcomey v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Narcomey v. Hull, 1931 OK 194, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 873 (Okla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK 194, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/narcomey-v-hull-okla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack