Naraine v. Naraine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Naraine v. Naraine

238 A.D.2d 488, 657 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 488 (Naraine v. Naraine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naraine v. Naraine, 238 A.D.2d 488, 657 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated October 5, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

[489]*489Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly dismissed the complaint since the plaintiffs failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence any of their causes of action (see, Gazzola Bldg. Corp. v Shapiro, 181 AD2d 718).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit or do not warrant reversal. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated October 5, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

[489]*489Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly dismissed the complaint since the plaintiffs failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence any of their causes of action (see, Gazzola Bldg. Corp. v Shapiro, 181 AD2d 718).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit or do not warrant reversal. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 488, 657 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naraine-v-naraine-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack