NAPUS Federal Credit Union v. Dave Campbell

Eighth Circuit

NAPUS Federal Credit Union v. Dave Campbell

419 F. App'x 696

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2011·No. 10-3714·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dave Campbell appeals from the order of the District Court 1 denying his motion to set aside an adverse award of attorney fees in this removed civil action. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Campbell’s motion. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert, denied, 534 U.S. 975, 122 S.Ct. 400, 151 L.Ed.2d 304 (2001). We affirm the District Court and deny as moot appellee’s motion to dismiss.

1

. The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dave Campbell appeals from the order of the District Court 1 denying his motion to set aside an adverse award of attorney fees in this removed civil action. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Campbell’s motion. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert, denied, 534 U.S. 975, 122 S.Ct. 400, 151 L.Ed.2d 304 (2001). We affirm the District Court and deny as moot appellee’s motion to dismiss.

1

. The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

NAPUS Federal Credit Union v. Dave Campbell, 419 F. App'x 696 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

419 F. App'x 696 (NAPUS Federal Credit Union v. Dave Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related