Nappo v. Menorah Campus, Inc.

216 A.D.2d 876, 628 N.Y.S.2d 907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 876 (Nappo v. Menorah Campus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nappo v. Menorah Campus, Inc., 216 A.D.2d 876, 628 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified [877]*877affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court improperly granted summary judgment to defendant and third-party plaintiff Amthor Steel, Inc. (Amthor), against plaintiff’s decedent’s employer, third-party defendant W.E. Darin Construction Enterprises, Inc. (Darin) based upon contractual indemnification. Amthor failed to establish by proof in evidentiary form that the parties agreed (orally or otherwise) to an indemnification provision in their contract. Amthor cannot rely on its purchase order to establish that provision without proof that the purchase order accurately reflects a verbal agreement of October 30, 1991 that is mentioned therein.

The court properly granted summary judgment to defendant and third-party plaintiff Menorah Campus, Incorporated, based upon common-law indemnification. A property owner who is only vicariously liable under the Labor Law is entitled to common-law indemnification from the party that actually supervised, directed or controlled the work giving rise to the injury sustained by plaintiff’s decedent (see, Chapel v Mitchell, 84 NY2d 345, 347). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.—Contribution and Indemnification.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baun v. Project Orange Associates, L.P.
26 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Shaheen v. Hueber-Breuer Construction Co.
4 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Davis v. Manitou Construction Co.
299 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
DiVincenzo v. Tripart Development, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Dias v. Stahl
256 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Conley v. Salt City Energy Venture, L.P.
234 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Delaney v. Spiegel Associates
225 A.D.2d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re Savigny
221 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Mitchell v. County of Jefferson
217 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D.2d 876, 628 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nappo-v-menorah-campus-inc-nyappdiv-1995.