Nappa v. . Erie Railroad Company

112 N.E. 1066, 217 N.Y. 650, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1410

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 1916·Published

Opinion

J udgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Kruse, J. (155 App. Div. 9).

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddebach, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nappa v. . Erie Railroad Company, 112 N.E. 1066, 217 N.Y. 650, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1410 (N.Y. 1916).

Pincite

112 N.E. 1066 (Nappa v. . Erie Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.